Where do expectations for the third quarter and full-year guidance differ?

  • Morgan Stanley expects Lineage’s third-quarter 2026 adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) per share to be 0.70 dollars and EBITDA to be 317.7 million dollars, close to the market consensus of 0.69 dollars and 316.7 million dollars, respectively.
  • The bank expects pressure from higher oil prices on the GIS logistics business and higher interest costs to lead the company to lower its 2026 AFFO per share guidance by 0.025 dollars to 2.90 dollars; it also expects EBITDA guidance to be lowered by 2.5 million dollars to 1.2725 billion dollars.
  • Improvement in storage has yet to translate into growth in same-warehouse net operating income (NOI): the bank expects a year-on-year decline of 2.6% in the third quarter, narrower than the 2.9% decline in the second quarter.

Cold-storage demand is stabilizing: What are the evidence and constraints?

  • US Department of Agriculture data show that cold-storage inventories rose 4.2% year on year in August, compared with a decline of 0.2% in July. Inventories rose 4.9% month on month in August, above the historical average increase of 3.2% since 2012. However, inventories were still down 1.4% year on year over the past 12 months, and occupancy typically reaches a seasonal peak in the fourth quarter.
  • Higher inventories could come from customer restocking or reflect slower product turnover. Morgan Stanley believes throughput and customer feedback can help distinguish between the two.
  • New supply is slowing: CoStar data show that cold-storage capacity grew 0.7% year on year in the third quarter of 2026, below 3.0% a year earlier. However, cumulative supply growth of approximately 15% in 2021–2025 significantly exceeded demand growth of approximately 5%; the third-quarter vacancy rate rose to 7.0% from 6.4% a year earlier, and existing excess capacity continues to constrain pricing.

Why has improved occupancy not yet driven profit growth?

  • Same-warehouse physical occupancy rose 90 basis points year on year in the second quarter, but throughput fell 1.8% and storage revenue per economically occupied pallet fell 0.4%; same-warehouse revenue grew just 0.4%, while NOI fell 2.9%. Greater occupancy of storage positions needs to be accompanied by improved goods turnover and pricing to drive revenue more effectively.
  • GIS margins face another chain of cost transmission: management says fuel costs are normally passed on to customers, but rising full-truckload and less-than-truckload carrier rates and delays in repricing customer contracts put more direct pressure on margins. Excluding 7 million dollars in legal settlement costs, the second-quarter GIS margin was 19.1%, versus a reported 17.1%.
  • The company’s full-year GIS NOI growth guidance calls for a decline of 4% to 2%, including settlement costs and temporary pressure from carrier costs; Morgan Stanley believes higher oil prices could push the result below the low end of guidance.

Why has the operating recovery not yet produced growth in AFFO per share?

  • Management aims to achieve annual administrative and overhead cost savings of more than 50 million dollars, with approximately half expected in 2026; it also expects LinOS to deliver approximately 110 million dollars in annual EBITDA savings over three to five years.
  • Morgan Stanley expects same-warehouse NOI growth to improve from negative 1.1% in 2026 to positive 1.8% in 2027, driving EBITDA growth of approximately 4.9% to 1.3373 billion dollars in 2027. However, the bank expects AFFO per share in 2027 to remain at 2.90 dollars, unchanged from 2026 and below the market consensus of 2.95 dollars.
  • Whether operational improvements translate into per-share earnings depends on the actual realization of savings and changes in cash interest, taxes, recurring capital expenditure and share count. Potential sales of non-strategic assets could help reduce leverage but may also dilute near-term earnings.
  • Morgan Stanley maintains its overweight rating and 47-dollar price target, implying a valuation of approximately 16.2 times its 2027 AFFO per share forecast. Faster volume recovery and cost savings could provide upside, while storage pricing pressure and delays in GIS margin recovery are the main constraints.