Start with the source and the question
Research explainers are based on the source report; interview explainers use the corresponding video or transcript. The writing focuses on material changes, relevant comparisons and the reasoning behind a conclusion. Source files and internal evidence are stored separately from the published explanation.
Where AI is used
The research workflow uses text extraction, OCR when needed, and AI-assisted writing, followed by checks on structure, source fields and content rules. The writing instructions require important figures and judgments to connect to supplied evidence. Automated checks have limits; publication does not carry a claim that every statement has received individual human review.
Keep attribution and conditions intact
The editorial rules distinguish actual results, company guidance, institutional forecasts and conditional scenarios. Figures retain their subject, currency, unit, period and comparison baseline. Ratings and price targets are attributed to the original institution. Material counter-evidence, costs, timing and conditions belong alongside the conclusion they affect.
Dates and revisions
The report date is the date of the original material. The site publication time records when the explanation first became public on Unhidea. Unknown report dates are left blank rather than filled with a download date. Revisions retain the first-publication time. Read conclusions in the context of the source date.
Citing and correcting an article
When citing an Unhidea explanation, link to that article and retain the attribution to the original institution or interviewee. Check the original material when using its research conclusions directly. Send corrections with the article URL and supporting evidence to help@unhidea.com.