What changed with the 104-week data?

  • In the Chinese phase III TELIGAN study involving 318 participants, the annualized change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 104 weeks was a decline of 0.6 mL/min/1.73m² per year in the telitacicept group, versus a decline of 5.7 in the placebo group, a treatment difference of 5.1 per year. This means kidney function declined significantly more slowly in the treatment group.
  • Compared with placebo, the telitacicept group had an 89% lower risk of a confirmed eGFR decline of at least 30% and an 81% lower risk of a decline of at least 40%; no prespecified composite kidney failure endpoint events occurred in the treatment group.

How does improvement in proteinuria support long-term protection?

  • At 104 weeks, 44.0% of patients in the telitacicept group had a 24-hour urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) below 0.5 g/g, compared with 8.2% in the placebo group. UPCR fell 60.3% from baseline in the treatment group and rose 0.9% in the placebo group.
  • Gd-IgA1 fell 47.79% from baseline in the treatment group and rose 19.06% in the placebo group. J.P. Morgan believes this change supports telitacicept’s dual-target BLyS/APRIL mechanism of action.

How does it compare with the reference drug in the Chinese market?

  • J.P. Morgan uses the mainland China subgroup of the Nefecon phase III study as the closest local reference: the subgroup included 62 patients and showed a two-year time-weighted average eGFR benefit of 9.6 mL/min/1.73m² versus placebo; UPCR fell 43% at 24 months.
  • The bank believes telitacicept’s long-term kidney function and proteinuria data are competitive, and that its randomized Chinese study had a larger sample. The eGFR measures in the two studies differ: the former is the difference in annualized rates of change, while the latter is the difference in two-year time-weighted averages.

How might clinical data translate into market use?

  • J.P. Morgan believes the data support telitacicept as an immunomodulatory treatment option for high-risk IgA nephropathy patients in China. But physician feedback indicates that treatment pathways are not yet consistent; proteinuria levels, biopsy practices, physician preferences, insurance reimbursement and patients’ ability to pay all affect drug selection.
  • Patients with lower proteinuria may continue conservative treatment; those with proteinuria above approximately 0.5 grams per day or higher-risk characteristics may use newer drugs such as Nefecon and telitacicept.
  • Long-term cost is an important factor in near-term adoption. Nefecon appears to be used more widely in regions where medical insurance reduces out-of-pocket costs; whether telitacicept can expand its use depends partly on how much long-term treatment costs fall after its IgA nephropathy indication potentially gains medical insurance coverage in 2027.
  • J.P. Morgan maintains its Overweight rating on RemeGen’s A-shares, with a target price of 151 yuan for December 2027, based on a discounted cash flow model.