How large was the efficacy gap in the new trial?

  • Among 455 previously untreated patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer, PD-L1 expression below 1%, and no EGFR or ALK alterations, median progression-free survival was 15.0 months with sac-TMT plus pembrolizumab and 5.7 months with chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab; the hazard ratio for disease progression or death was 0.49.
  • At a median follow-up of 9.4 months, the objective response rates were similar in the two groups, at 50.2% and 47.3%, respectively; median duration of response was 13.6 months and 6.8 months, respectively. The advantage came mainly from responses lasting longer, rather than a substantially higher initial response rate.
  • Overall survival data remain immature, with the current hazard ratio of 0.58 directionally favoring the sac-TMT group. Management noted that the confidence interval for median progression-free survival at the interim analysis was wide and that the figure could fluctuate subsequently; JPMorgan believes the trial’s sample size and hazard ratio support the durability of the efficacy signal.

What does the safety profile mean for first-line treatment?

  • The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events was 47.6% in the sac-TMT combination group, lower than the 60.6% in the chemotherapy combination group. JPMorgan considers the safety profile manageable, strengthening the case for first-line use.
  • Severe reductions in blood cell counts were also less frequent: grade 3 or higher anemia occurred in 6.1% of patients, versus 20.4% in the control group; the corresponding rates of decreased platelet counts were 3.9% and 14.6%. Grade 3 or higher stomatitis occurred in 2.2% of the sac-TMT group.

Why did another trial of a drug in the same class prompt discussion?

  • The overall EVOKE-03 trial result was negative, but in a post hoc regional analysis, the overall survival hazard ratio for the Trodelvy regimen was 0.73 in East Asian patients and 0.65 in Chinese patients; the confidence intervals for both populations crossed 1, prompting some investors to focus on the comparability of Chinese trial results when extrapolated globally.
  • JPMorgan believes the result should not be overinterpreted: the Chinese subgroup was small, the analysis was post hoc and unstratified, and the distribution of biomarkers such as PD-L1 across subgroups was unknown. The bank also noted that Kolon’s earlier Lung05 trial had a progression-free survival hazard ratio of 0.35 and an immature overall survival hazard ratio of 0.55; the strong efficacy supports the potential success of its global program.

How do these data affect the assessment of Kolon’s development and valuation?

  • JPMorgan believes Lung06 and the earlier Lung05 together support the opportunity for sac-TMT in broader first-line lung cancer treatment, particularly among patients with low PD-L1 expression; PD-1 monotherapy is generally less effective in this population.
  • Management said Merck, which has acquired the rights to sac-TMT outside China, may directly initiate a trial in 2027 of its PD-1/VEGF drug combined with sac-TMT for non-small cell lung cancer, potentially skipping a new phase III trial of pembrolizumab plus sac-TMT.
  • JPMorgan forecasts that sac-TMT’s peak sales in China could exceed 9 billion yuan and reach 6 billion US dollars outside China; it maintains its Overweight rating on Kolon Biotech and its December 2026 price target of 677 Hong Kong dollars.