Original source:BofA Global ResearchFirst published on Unhidea:Original source date:
Key takeaway
Glodon’s earnings resilience mainly reflects cost controls. BofA believes demand will begin to recover no earlier than 2027, and early progress in AI commercialization has not changed its view that revenue remains under pressure.
The revenue decline narrowed. Why is BofA still lowering its forecasts?
Glodon’s revenue in the third quarter of 2026 was approximately 1.46 billion yuan, down 2% year on year and 4% below BofA’s forecast; net profit was approximately 74 million yuan, broadly flat year on year. Profit held up, but revenue recovered more slowly than the bank had expected.
The cost-estimation business, which accounts for the bulk of revenue, generated approximately 1.14 billion yuan in the third quarter, down 1% year on year, an improvement from the 6% decline in the first half. Performance within the segment diverged: growth in engineering data services was offset by falling revenue from traditional quantity takeoff and cost-pricing products, and the business as a whole has yet to return to growth.
Construction management revenue was approximately 205 million yuan in the third quarter, down 6% year on year, a slightly wider decline than the 5% fall in the first half. BofA sees persistent weakness in downstream property sales and new construction starts as a constraint on demand and expects recovery to begin no earlier than 2027.
Which improvement kept profit broadly flat?
The main support came from expense controls. Third-quarter administrative expenses fell 20% year on year, declining to 15.3% of revenue, down 3.4 percentage points; selling expenses fell 3% year on year, with the expense ratio dropping to 31.0%. As revenue declined, savings in these two areas helped stabilize profit.
Cost pressures did not ease across the board: gross margin fell 0.3 percentage points year on year to 86.3%; R&D expenses rose 8% year on year, driven by higher amortization, and increased by 3 percentage points as a share of revenue to 32.4%.
Taken together, these changes left operating margin up 0.4 percentage points year on year at 6.8%, while net margin rose 0.1 percentage points to 5.0%. Cost controls were the main driver of this quarter’s earnings improvement, while revenue remained in contraction.
What progress has been made in AI and overseas business?
AI monetization has made early progress, and the company has begun commercializing some AI-native products, including AI-based industrial installation quantity takeoff and AI-based cost pricing. However, revenue from traditional cost-estimation products is still declining, so progress in new products currently coexists with pressure on the core business overall.
Overseas revenue was approximately 61 million yuan in the third quarter, broadly flat year on year. Management disclosed that, including deferred SaaS subscription revenue, overseas business grew by a double-digit percentage year on year in the first three quarters of 2026, while the value of new orders from Asian customers rose more than 30% year on year; the periods and measurement bases for these indicators differ from those for revenue recognized in a single quarter.
Digital design revenue rose 50% year on year in the third quarter, but amounted to only 26 million yuan. The high-growth business added revenue, though its current scale remains significantly smaller than the cost-estimation and construction management businesses.
How do these developments affect earnings forecasts and valuation?
Slower revenue recovery and relatively high R&D expenses prompted BofA to cut its earnings forecasts for each year from 2026 to 2028 by approximately 4%. After the revision, the bank expects net profit of 485 million, 598 million and 700 million yuan, respectively, over the three years. It still expects earnings growth, but from a lower starting point.
BofA maintained its Underperform rating and lowered its price target from 7.2 yuan to 7.0 yuan. Its valuation still uses a price-to-earnings multiple of 20 times for the next 12 months, a 25% discount to the average for Chinese software peers, reflecting expectations of slower revenue growth. The price-target adjustment accompanied the earnings forecast cuts; the valuation multiple was unchanged.
This assessment depends on the pace of recovery in demand for property and construction software. Stronger growth in cloud contracts, a faster property-market recovery or improved gross margin in construction management could provide upside; lower renewal rates for cloud cost-estimation software and weaker construction projects and related IT spending would add to revenue pressure.