Why was profit markedly below expectations despite broadly flat revenue?
- In the third quarter of 2026, Haitian Flavouring recorded revenue of 6.407 billion yuan, up 0.1% year on year and in line with Goldman Sachs’ expectations. Net profit was 1.19 billion yuan, down 15.4% year on year and markedly weaker than the 1% decline Goldman Sachs had previously expected.
- Core operating profit fell 13% year on year, and the core operating margin declined to 21.2%, down 3.1 percentage points year on year and 1.8 percentage points below Goldman Sachs’ estimate. A lower-than-expected gross margin was the main reason core operating profit missed expectations, while a higher expense ratio added further pressure.
- The net margin fell 3.4 percentage points year on year to 18.6%. A year-on-year increase in foreign exchange losses also weighed on net profit, partly offset by a 3.6 percentage point decline in the effective tax rate.
Which products and regions weighed on sales?
- Third-quarter condiment revenue fell 0.9% year on year, compared with growth of 5.4% in the first half. This measure includes Amoy Food, which was consolidated following completion of the acquisition, though its contribution was small.
- Soy sauce revenue fell 1.7% year on year, compared with growth of 4.6% in the first half; oyster sauce revenue fell 5.1%, compared with growth of 2.6% in the first half. Management attributed the weak performance to subdued restaurant demand and intensifying competition, and noted that oyster sauce has a relatively narrow range of uses.
- Seasoning sauce revenue grew 2% year on year, remaining relatively resilient, while other sales revenue grew 19%, supporting total revenue. By region, third-quarter revenue fell 11% year on year in central China and 2% in eastern China, while southern China grew 6%.
Where did the cost and expense pressures come from?
- The third-quarter gross margin was 37.3%, down 2.3 percentage points year on year and below the second-quarter level of 39.8%. Goldman Sachs believes higher soybean and PET prices may be the reason: their respective spot prices rose more than 20% and 50% year on year.
- The company is evaluating price increase options but has not yet made a decision. As sales growth slowed, third-quarter selling expenses rose 5% year on year, and the selling expense ratio climbed to 7.8%; administrative expenses rose 8%, and the administrative expense ratio increased to 7.5%.
- Management said elevated administrative expenses in the second and third quarters included one-off spending such as the headquarters relocation, as well as upfront investment in digitalization, AI applications and recruitment. It expects the full-year administrative expense ratio to normalize.
How did Goldman Sachs revise its outlook?
- Given persistently weak restaurant demand recently, Goldman Sachs lowered its revenue forecasts for 2026–2028 by up to 3%. It also lowered its net profit forecasts for the same period by 5%–8%, factoring in raw material cost pressures continuing through the second half and potentially into 2027, as well as weaker expense leverage.
- The fourth quarter faces a high comparison base, with revenue having grown 11% in the same period of 2025. Goldman Sachs expects the company to prioritize channel health, with shipments under year-on-year pressure in October and potentially recovering from November through December on pre-Lunar New Year stocking.
- Goldman Sachs maintained its Buy rating on the H shares and Neutral rating on the A shares, and cut its 12-month H-share target price from HK$35.2 to HK$32.8. The bank expects H-share dividend yields of about 5% in 2026 and 2027, and noted that the company already has a share buyback plan of about HK$500 million.