Why are upward earnings revisions beginning to slow?
- About one-third of the way through earnings season, companies that have reported third-quarter 2026 results have seen market consensus earnings per share estimates for calendar 2026 and 2027 raised by an average of 3% and 8%, respectively; the corresponding revisions after second-quarter results were 7% and 10%.
- Citi notes that upward revision momentum has slowed more markedly for semiconductor equipment companies than for chipmakers; networking and analog chips lead in momentum, followed by computing chips, while equipment has weakened and memory has recovered. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index has fallen 8% since the bank published its earnings preview.
- Citi is more cautious on equipment stocks: supply-chain and component constraints could limit the scope for further increases in wafer fab equipment spending forecasts.
How does tight memory supply affect the industry outlook?
- SK hynix’s results were driven by higher average selling prices; the company signed agreements of roughly five years with 14 major customers, covering more than half of its capacity for 2027–2028. Based on current customer demand, its DRAM and high-bandwidth memory capacity is effectively sold out through 2029.
- Samsung says industry memory supply remains constrained and expects AI demand to continue exceeding industry supply in 2027–2028; the company has signed long-term supply agreements with 10 major customers.
- Citi believes supply constraints will further improve the near-term memory supply-demand balance, benefiting Micron.
Why does the analog chip recovery remain uneven?
- Texas Instruments beat expectations and raised guidance, driven by data-center and industrial demand; NXP’s fourth-quarter 2026 revenue outlook fell below market consensus because of weaker automotive demand.
- Analog chipmakers are offsetting input cost inflation through price increases, lead times are lengthening, customer requests for faster delivery are increasing, and capacity utilization is around 85%. But Citi believes this recovery is at a relatively late stage and is broadly reflected in market consensus, so it prefers manufacturers with their own capacity and growing data-center exposure.
How much support can cloud providers’ capital spending still offer?
- Citi says the capital spending outlooks of four of the five largest cloud providers are broadly little changed, pointing to year-on-year growth of approximately 90% in fiscal 2026 and more than 40% in fiscal 2027. Meta’s and Alphabet’s 2026 capital spending guidance is largely unchanged, implying year-on-year growth at the midpoint of 94% and 119%, respectively.
- Microsoft lowered its capital spending outlook because of delays in third-party capacity deliveries, but its total capital spending guidance of 170 billion dollars for calendar 2026 still implies year-on-year growth of 44%; on that basis, Citi estimates Azure spending could reach 163 billion dollars, approximately 11 billion dollars below its previous forecast.
- Looking ahead to 2027, Microsoft expects capital spending to accelerate in the second half of fiscal 2027, while Alphabet reiterated that spending will increase significantly in 2027; Citi also views Oracle’s statement that capital spending will peak in fiscal 2027 or 2028 as support for near-term spending.